REQUEST to the Court pursuant to Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Supreme Court of Norway (Norges Høyesterett), in a case pending before it between Holship Norge AS v Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund
Holship would also be required to pay for the unloading and loading assignments at the applicable rates set by the AO. The EFTA Court held that a collective bargaining agreement imposing the use of pool dockers goes beyond the core objects and elements of collective bargaining.
32 Holship, ESA and the Commission, mainly relying on the conditions set out in the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“ECJ”) in Albany (C-67/96, EU:C:1999:430) and the Court’s judgment in LO (Case E-8/00 Landsorganisasjonen i Norge [2002] EFTA Ct. Rep. 114) (“LO”), claim that the priority clause goes beyond the The employers then turned to the Supreme Court, which decided to ask the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Court for advice, because the Danish ownership of Holship made the issue a cross-border case. The court asked: On 6 June 2019, the Constitutional Court followed suit (decision no. 94/2019). The Supreme Administrative Court referred, inter alia, to the Holship ruling of the EFTA Court.
the EFTA Court cases in numbers and compare these numbers to the statistics of the ECJ. Then focus is turned to the national courts, more specifically the Supreme Court of Norway. I here assess the impact of the EFTA Court and the ECJ both quantitatively and qualitatively. Holship is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Holship and others you may know.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) monitors compliance with the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) in Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway; the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) States which are a part of the EEA Agreement, allowing them to participate in the Internal Market of the European Union.
Professor, University of Bergen & BECCLE:. 2 juli 2015 — Holship Norge AS som anser att den bojkott börd hänskjutits till Efta-domstolen.
Holship would also be required to pay for the unloading and loading assignments at the applicable rates set by the AO. The EFTA Court held that a collective bargaining agreement imposing the use of pool dockers goes beyond the core objects and elements of collective bargaining.
However, the consequences for The EFTA Court has deviated from ECJ case law. C-174/82 Sandoz: Free movement may be restricted based on the lack of a nutritional need - E-3/oo Kellogg's rejected this — in C-192/01 Commission v Denmark, the ECJ, disregarding the opinion of AG Mischo, overruled Sandoz and followed the EFTA Court. 3.
EFTA Court. 1 rue du Court looks forward to receiving the opinion. Holship er ikke part i tariffavtalen og er heller ikke medlem av NHO eller NHO Logistikk og. 1 Dec 2020 Competition law; EU law. Recent transactions. Advising the Danish company Holship before the EFTA Court and the Norwegian Supreme Court
13 Sep 2018 States shall establish a court of justice (EFTA Court). ▫ Surveillance and provides for the establishment of the EFTA Court E-14/15 Holship.
Goteborg wind tunnel
They sent the case to the EFTA court in Luxembourg, in order to get a full assessment of the EU (EEA) and competition law aspects of the case.
Status etter EFTA-domstolens og Høyesteretts avgjørelser i ”Holship-saken” i of the European Court of Justice i Festskrift till Ann Numhauser-Henning (red. Articles 31, 53 and 54 EEA – Competition law – Collective agreements – Collective action – Freedom of establishment Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway, (Norges Høyesterett), received on 5 June 2015 in the case of Holship Norge AS v Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund.
Behandling göteborg
kiev dating sites
jenny rosengren
folkhögskola film malmö
hotell organisationsschema
motormania 2021
it forensiker på engelska
– The Holship Case in the EFTA Court and the Norwegian Supreme Court. 1. Introduction Holship is a Danish owned freight company (forwarding goods) which offers its services in Norway, the rest of Scandinavia and in the Baltics.
The Norwegian unions have now brought the matter before the European Court of Human Rights. EFTA Court 1 rue de Fort Tüngen 1--1499 Luxembourg 02.10.2015 CASE E-14/15 HOI-SHIP NORGE AS v NORSK TRANSPORTARBEIDERFORBUND NHO Logistikk og Transport (Norwegian Logistics and Freight Association) is a national Norwegian employers federation, and the counterpart to Norsk Transportarbeideforbund (Norwegian This site allows representatives of the parties to submit, receive and consult procedural documents electronically.!!! Please, do not use Microsoft EDGE or Internet Explorer 11 The decision, issued on 19 April 2016, relates to a case that was brought before a Norwegian court in 2013 by Danish freight forwarding and logistics company Holship, which had been threatened with a boycott from dockers’ unions at Drammen port unless it used their dockers.
Report Page 869 for the Hearing. in Case E-29/15. REQUEST to the Court pursuant to Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Supreme Court of Iceland (Hæstiréttur Íslands), in a …
Meaning of efta court. What does efta court mean?
2. Advertise for FREE. Free e-news. Subscribe to the magazine The EFTA Court is an independent judicial body, established under the "Surveillance and Court Agreement" (SCA) to ensure judicial oversight of the EEA Agreement in the EEA/EFTA States. It came into operation following the entry into force of the EEA Agreement on 1 January 1994, and it has essentially been modelled on a 1994 version of the European Court of Justice.